Thursday, 11 June 2015

and the Road Warrior is now a woman! Mad Max Fury Road



Yes, it is true, the real mover of this fourth Mad Max movie is Charlize Theron's Furiosa Imperator, not Max, and that is fine. 

 Fury Road seems to me to be an extraordinarily well made futuristic road movie.  
I strongly recommend it to anyone who likes action movies and/or brilliant design and camera work.   This is not a CGI extravaganza, it was made without green-screens and computerized FX.   George Miller had, I read, 150 vehicles at his disposal, and boy does he dispose of them as they race across the Australian (actually Namibian) desert going there and back again.  

Charlize Theron  gives us a gritty and determined action-movie lead character, with depth, in the central role of Furiosa Imperator, a warrior and driver whose rebellion takes the form of rescuing pregnant concubines from the Citadel’s ruler, Immortan,  and  heading for the Green Land from which she was herself abducted as a child.    Tom Hardy as Mad Max is initially her unwilling and hapless passenger, but soon joins battle with her against the pursuing hordes.
They are both gifted performers.   There is not a lot of dialogue in this movie, but both actors know how to communicate without words.  Hardy provides a persuasive reincarnation of Max  and Charlize once more plays against her beautiful clothes-horse image.    I have long been a fan of both these actors and its good to see them together.   Nicolas Hoult as Nux provides a pleasing sub-plot.   Many of the characters are truly cartoonish, but others  have subtlety and development

At the start of the film Max is captured and taken to The Citadel where he becomes a walking blood-bank for Nux (Nicholas Hoult), a sick young warrior who does not  look as if he is going to get much older.   Hardy does not have the wild eyed insanity of Mel Gibson’s version, and almost under-plays his part.   Max  is haunted by the ghosts of the woman and girl-child he could not save in earlier Mad Max movies.   Now he is looking for redemption; but not  through violence.    He is certainly not looking for a fight.  Sometimes, however,  survival demands it of him.   For Furiosa and her pregnant female crew it is also a necessity.    All they can do is run, and when pursued, fight.
The cinematography is magnificent, directed by John Seale,  who came out of retirement for this project (as did Douglas Thrumbull for a very different movie, Terrence Malik’s The Tree of Life).   Seale once filmed the deserts of North Africa for The English Patient,  somehow making their graceful curves feminine and almost erotic.   Here he matches the visual imaginations of Miller and Brendan McCarthy (the co-writer and Design Consultant)  with great skill.   It has been made with enormous energy and focus by a veteran filmmaker who has modern rejected CGI and shown us once more the benefits of ‘straight’ film making.    The only CGI seems to be Furiosa’s proscetic arm and the magnificent desert storm through which she drives,  a maelstrom of sand and lightning.  
This is an amazingly visual and kinetic movie,  made with great  technical skill  as unrelenting in its power as the scores of amazing vehicles that hurtle across the post-apocalyptic desert.
Fury Road has been hailed by some - and denounced by others - as a feminist tract.  If it is feminist to assert that women should not be property, used as concubines or industrial-scale lactation producers (sic), then this is hardy an advance on Margaret Atwood’s Handmaid’s Tale, and it is sad to see that in 2015 a film that in simply takes womankind seriously can be  seen as a tract, or a triumph.
I was not sure how feminist it was to introduce the escaping women as they stand,   scarcely clad in muslin and chastity belts, as tall, beautiful and sultry as models on a Vogue cover.  Actually three of these actors have been fashion models,   including of course Charlize.   But these images are countered by the courage and determination (most of them) later display.     And Furiosa is the real mover here, Max simply becomes her sidekick, and in one telling scene he quietly acquiesces to her markswoman skills when a vital pot shot has to be made.     We also meet the Vuvatini, matriarchal bikers,  fearsome survivors of the Green Place,  whose lives contrast so dramatically with those in The Citadel.  I am sure it was a joke to leave out the ‘l’ in Vuvatini.
But is it so remarkable to have a female lead in an action movie?    Thirty years ago Tina Turner played Aunty Entity in sole charge of Barter Town in Thunderdome.   She was not warrior, she too smart for that,   and in the same film Max is rescued by the female hunter and leader of the children’s oasis,  Savannah Nix (Nix/Nux?).     
Since then we have seen Angelina Jolie as Lara Croft, Salt and Mrs. Smith,  and many more battling females.    Maybe Theron’s role is only remarkable in a Mad Max movie because  Mad Max 1 and  2  have been hailed by so many (knuckle headed) men as  hyper-masculine narratives, even myths.   
Charlize Theron has remarked that “I think George didn't have a feminist agenda up his sleeve, and I think that's what makes the story even more powerful, especially how the women are represented in it.    I think when we use the word 'feminism' people get a little freaked out, it's like we're somehow, like, being put on a pedestal or anything like that. George has this innate understanding that women are just as complex and interesting as men, and he was really interested in discovering all of that.  I think through just his need and want for the truth he actually made an incredible feminist movie."  

I loved the movie, but am a little sad that Brendan McCarthy has not been given more credit by critics as its co-screenwriter and design consultant.    Brendan is a gifted comic book artist.    He lives just  down the coast from me and we have had a number of conversations over coffee in town.   He was quietly talking about this movie two years ago, and I think he was important in encouraging George Miller to resurrect the franchise.      I can easily imagine particular scenes, props or images  coming straight out of Brendan’s notebook.      For example,  Furiosa has an elaborate prosetic arm.    There is no back story to explain its presence, and it does not seem to contribute to the plot  - or action – in any meaningful way, but it really looks cool.   She also chooses to use dirty engine oil as makeup.    Maybe that was to compensate for, or jokily comment on, her fashion work with L’Oreal.    We also see people  moving on four stilt-like crutches as we pass through the Dead Crow Land, and that’s cool too, even if no explanation is given about how they can survive where  no-on else can.    During the  car/truck/ hybrid chases that make up 90% of the movie we see warriors, called Polecats,  perched at the top of counter balanced poles swinging across the escaping rig’s track to drop grenades into its cab.     A grenade launcher or a good throwing arm would have done the same job, but with much less visual interest.   I can so easily see it on the pages of a comic book - in fact if you go the Brendan's website you will.

 And there is so much more to enjoy.   The Doog  Warrior is strapped to front of one war-wagon playing a huge double necked guitar/flame-thrower.  The flames are not employed to attack anything, they are just there to look good.    Another truck has a battery of koto style drummers joining The Doog and augmenting the soundtrack (shades of the Wagner-blasting attack helicopters in  Apocalypse Now!).   

As it happens I loved the design of Mad Max; Beyond Thunderdome,  Brendan’s least favourite of the previous three,   and we are given a fleeting glimpse of a Thunderdome structure, and many of the boys and men in Fury Road look like Scrooloose from the earlier film;  topless, with whitened bodies, shaven heads and blackened eyes.      All of these elements are simply cool, and precisely fit the comic book visual aesthetic as well as that of the previous films.   

The Citadel, where Immortan controls the flow of the precious element, water, is deeply fascist.   Entirely male dominated (Furiosa’s exceptional role is never explained – why wasn’t she forced to become another concubine?)  Immortan appears like a demi-god and is worshipped by his henchmen and subjects.   The  Citadel’s style is a mix of the Nordic and the Nazi, with its own mythology  and salvation narrative of Death and Glory.    For the young men serving Immortan dying in battle will promise rebirth in Valhalla.    And who would not want to be reborn somewhere other than in this desolate landscape, living in a tumour ridden body.    When Max finds himself an unwilling passenger on the escaping rig Nux is still tethered to him by his blood line and has to go with him to keep alive, but all he wants to do is die.  When at one point Immortan glances in his direction Nux’s joy is complete.    God loves him and his eternal salvation is secure.  
  
By refusing to embrace CGI  Miller and his team have shown us that the traditional skills of great design, terrific sound, amazing camera work and dedicated stunt work can outdo the results of more modern GCI in the hands of a great Director. 

As the Ebert web-site review says “Fury Road is a challenge to a whole generation of action filmmakers, urging them to follow its audacious path into the genre’s future and, like Miller, try their hardest to create something new.”

Monday, 4 May 2015

Ye that have ears to hear...


One benefit  of having moved to a new county is that I listen to new radio stations and therefore hear new music.   Moving to Ireland is especially good for this, with RTE Radio Lyric fm providing the most wide ranging and informed play-lists I have ever heard. 
So, just in case you haven’t come across any of the artists/albums that I have really enjoyed in the last few years, many of them from late night listening to In The Blue of The Night, 10 pm – 1 am on Lyric, here are some of them, from different genres, plus a couple from movies I have seen.
 Susanna Wallumrod is a Swedish singer who ranges from the classical to the experimental, an intelligent interpreter of songs by (among others) Leonard Cohen,  Dolly Parton, Phil Lynott, Sandy Denny,  Prince,  Roy Harper and Purcell,  always providing fresh readings.  I started with ‘If Grief Could Wait’ (ECM) and moved on.
 Susanna’s keyboard player is often Morten Qvenild, and he provides piano backing for another Swedish singer,  Solvieg Slettahjell, whose interpretation of The Stone’s Wild Horses is a revelation.  Solvieg also sings Cohen songs, and Cindy Lauper’s True Colors.  I don’t rank her as highly as Susanna, but you might.  Try her Antologie album.
 I have known the music of Barb Jungr or some time,  and she is one of the few whose interpretations of Bob Dylan I enjoy.  None can match Nina Simone’s for me, but, Jungr’s  Hard Rain; the Songs of Bob Dylan and Leonard Cohen is highly recommended. 
 Two more albums of interpretations (I will not call them ‘covers’, they do so much more than that) come from Herbie Hancock.  On  Rive, the Joni letters, (Verve)  he works with Wayne Shorter and Dave Holland on instrumentals,  while singers such as Corrine Bailey Rae, Norah Jones, Tina Turner and Leonard Cohen tackle Joni’s lyrics.   Joni herself re-records Tea Leaf Prophecy.
 On Possibilities (HEAR) he invited singers/musicians such as  Santana, Paul Simon, Annie Lennox, Sting, Damien Rice and Lisa Hannington to explore some of their own, and others, songs.    In case you are wondering there are no Dylan or Cohen songs here!)
I am ashamed to say that I had never come across Chris Wood until I heard him on Lyric.  I wonder how often he has been played one a BBC station?   His brand of contemporary English folk is properly political.  On handmade life (RUF)  his Hollow Point is a chilling and powerful retelling of the tragic death of Jean Charles Menezes, the Brazilian plumber mistaken for a terrorist and shot in London by the Police in 2005.    The Grand Correction rages against the 30 year plus heritage of Thatcherism, making the poorest in the land slaves to the market, and giving the (increasingly even more) rich the excuse that the marker rules.   But he also sings tender love songs – as if his political anger was not rooted in the aspect of love we call compassion.   Chris is also part of The Imagined Village.  
 Jazz often features on Lyric  and that’s where I heard from Chick Corea’s collaboration Duet recorded with the young Japanese pianist Hiromi on the Stretch label, and Hot House, his album with Gary Burton on Concord.    Just before he died in 1977 Paul Desmond laid down four tracks with Chet BakerTogether gives us these, plus three earlier collaborations, and is a gem.    For those who love either jazzmeister this is a joy,  the only sadness being that it was made so late in Paul’s life Thanks again, Lyric, for bringing it to my attention. 
 Lastly, for your delectation,  two Middle Eastern singers I came across at the movies.    In American Hustle Mayssa Haraa gave us a rendering of Grace Slick’s White Rabbit - in Lebanese.     Haraa is much valued as an interpreter of the poems of the Sufi mystic  Rumi, but I have not found any of these on record.    The soundtrack of American Hustle is brilliant anyway.   Jim Jarmusch’s film Only Lovers Left Alive also used a Middle Eastern voice, that of the Turkish Yasmine Hamdan.   Her album Ya Nass (Oh people) shows her powerful blend of jazz tinged folk. 
 Even if only one album or artist mentioned above brings you new joy I will be delighted.   I do not make space for comments on this Blog, but do have a Facebook page, (Robert Leslie Vernon), where feedback is wel

Tuesday, 28 April 2015

Gravity revisited and reappraised.

















OK, eventually I bought the DVD of Gravity.  I resisted for a long time as I did not want to diminish the original experience of seeing this film on a large cinema screen by recreating it on my 42" TV.      But I was wrong.    When I did see it on my own TV I realised that this movie is as much about inner space as outer space.   The spectacular special effects achieved in the making of the film rather obscured this aspect  when I first saw it.  

The visual recreation of simply being in space in a way never achieved before in the cinema - or in actual space flight reportage -  blew me away, and although I was aware of the narrative themes of struggle and rebirth, the discover of hope in the most hopeless situation, and the depth of human resourcefulness when push comes to deadly shove,  I confess that the medium overpowered the message.    Seeing it on a domestic scale revealed its humanity.   

But let us not underestimate the remarkable inventiveness, persistence and creative genius that created what we saw on the big screen.    I am glad to report that the technical teams that pioneered these techniques were British.    The risks the Producers, Director and production team took were immense, and it was not clear until very late in the four years it took to put the various elements together that it was actually going to work.    The DVD extras showing how this movie was actually made are a revelation.     They alone are enough to justify buying the DVD.    

But seeing the conditions in which Sandy Bullock and George Clooney had to work during this shoot also adds to our understanding of their achievement.   This was so far removed from simple Green Screen work that it demanded deep commitment, intelligence and concentration for extended periods of time.    Bullock's work was especially remarkable, with the physical demands she had to meet.  I will not reveal the details; please watch it yourself. 

But Gravity started with a story.  A very human story.    It is a story that happens to take place in space.  It could be happening right above our heads at this moment.  This is not futuristic science fiction.  It is about as close to present day science fact as the Director could make it.    But the genre is secondary to the story, to the deeply human story.  It is not a complex story, and it may not be profound, but not all stories have to be complex or profound.   For some of us Hemingway's most powerful novel is his shortest and simplest, The Old Man and the Sea.  This story is relevant and rings true.   It is also life affirming, and at the end of the day - or the end of movie - that is a quality most dear to me.  Not the typical and cynical Hollywood 'feel good factor' but more like the feeling we sometimes find in D H Lawrence's poetry, that 'we have come through', and our humanity has not been diminished by the trials and sacrifices we have witnessed  but has somehow been deepened.  


Sunday, 12 April 2015

Fresh Cinders



In his time Kenneth Branagh has acted as D H Lawrence and Henry Vth,  Jimmy Porter and Iago, Reinhard Heydrich,  Shackleton and Larry Olivier.    You cannot say that he is a one trick pony.

He has also has directed seventeen movies in a variety of genres, including a CIA thriller, Jack Ryan; Shadow Recruit,  a Marvel adventure, Thor,  a thriller/comedy, Sleuth, the opera The Magic Flute, Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein,  Peter’s Friends and  seven of Shakespeare plays.   He even tried a Hitchcock lookalike, Dead Again.    And now he has directed Cinderella?   For Disney?  With glass slippers and blue birds?   No subversion, not even irony?   With neither parody nor  deconstruction?  Well yes, he has, and he has made a rather fine job of it too.  

Cinders is played by  Lily James, with Cate Blanchett as her step-mother and Richard Madden as the Prince,  along with  Helena Bonham-Carter, Stellan Skarsgard, Derek Jacobi,  Nonso Anozie, Ben Chaplin.    Many of the secondary cast seem to have come from Downton Abbey and/or Game of Thrones, so for some of us at least they are unfamiliar faces.   They are also, apart from Ms Blanchett, British.    That saves us from clashing accents,  giving a consistence to the dialogue, a consistency that carries into the other areas of the movie, its tone, music, design and mise-en-scene.     That last quality is hard to define, and even to spot, but you do notice it when it is not right.    Not consciously, perhaps, but with a sense of unease.  Of things not quite hanging together. 

The script is by Chris Weitz, who previously adapted Philip Pullman’s magnificent trilogy His Dark Materials.   Sadly only the first part, The Golden Compass, made it to the screen owing to powerful American ‘Christian’ opposition.    That was no easy task, but he delivers the same clear narrative lines and character development here as there.   Even Cate has a chance to play for our (limited) sympathy.     Helena Bonham-Carter is the Fairy godmother, and relishes it.  I like to see HB-C relishing.   Personal aside;  I attended the play Don Carlos in London a few years ago and during the interval had to push my way between HB-C and Tim Burton.  Really, I had to.   You can guess which way I faced, and when for a second I looked down – looked a long way down,  she really is quite tiny – into her eyes,   that second lasted for a hundred years.    Just thought I’d share that.

The original Disney film of Cinderella was the animation of 1950.  In 1998 Andy Tennant co-scripted and directed Ever Aftera Cinderella Story,  ‘the true story’,   with Drew Barrymore and Dougray Scott as the lovers and Anjelica Huston as ‘Mother’.   This gave it a historical setting – 16th century France – and was, it seems,  well made.  It came out hard on the heels of another adaptation of a tale,    Snow White; A Tale of Terror,  with Sigourney Weaver as the stepmother set in the time of the Crusades and much  grimmer - pun intended.   It seems the original tales were for adults, not children,  and were truly dark.   A new edition of these has just been published.   

The new Disney film tells it straight. It cost an estimated $95 million to make but the mone is, as they say, all up there on the screen, with a magnificent palace,  sumptuous costumes and   charming special effects.    The music is by Branagh’s long time  collaborator  Patrick Doyle and is suitably period and lush.    So is the cinematography by another past collaborator, Haris Zambarloukos.   The Production Designer was Dante Ferretti, who has worked with Martin Scorsese a number of times.    So has Sandy Powell, the British costume designer.   They work well together. 

So what do we have here?   A perfectly straight forward,  beautifully made, well acted  account of a charming fairy story that has not been seen (straight) on our screens for 65 years.    

I really cannot remember the Disney cartoon clearly enough to compare it with this, but if this is what we have for the next 65 years it is good enough for me.     I do hope Disney will release the DVD soon, and drop their annoying habit of hanging onto them to make scarcity add the their value.     

PS.  Talking of DVDs I hope the we will soon see the release of Branagh's wonderful MacBeth, staged during last year's Manchester Festival.      Theatre friends of mine who have attended many productions of the play - and taught it - say it is the  best they have ever seen.  It was certainly the best I have ever seen, as stated elsewhere in my blog.